AI Agents & Evals

AI agents get hyped as autonomous coworkers and dismissed as glorified chatbots. Both miss the point. An agent is a loop: a model that calls tools, hits errors, retries, and sometimes finishes the job. What separates a demo from something you'd run in production is rarely the model. It's the harness, the tool design, and whether you can actually measure when it works. That's why agents and evaluation belong together here. I track the architectures that hold up, the eval methods that catch failure before your users do, and the honest gap between a slick demo and a system that ships.

191 posts

Start here · Deep dive The Evaluate-First Turn in AI Research Agents Three fresh arXiv papers converge on the same lesson: autonomous research agents fail less because they can't code and more because they can't judge, structure, or maintain their own work, so the fix is building evaluation and infrastructure before generation.

Recent articles (30)

Earlier articles (160)