AI Agents & Evals

AI agents get hyped as autonomous coworkers and dismissed as glorified chatbots. Both miss the point. An agent is a loop: a model that calls tools, hits errors, retries, and sometimes finishes the job. What separates a demo from something you'd run in production is rarely the model. It's the harness, the tool design, and whether you can actually measure when it works. That's why agents and evaluation belong together here. I track the architectures that hold up, the eval methods that catch failure before your users do, and the honest gap between a slick demo and a system that ships.

410 posts

Start here · Deep dive Self-Improving Agents Without RL: What Retrospection, Creativity, and Token Forecasting Actually Show Three 2026 arXiv papers push on agents that get better without full RL: fine-tuning on self-explanations, learning to be creative on purpose, and forecasting token spend mid-run. Here is what holds up, what is thin, and what an operator can use today.

Recent articles (30)

Earlier articles (379)